• Home
  • About
    • OPEN 2020
    • OPEN 2019
    • OPEN 2018
    • OPEN 2017
  • Blog
  • Collaborate
  • Contact

The Open Co-op

Where open meets co-op

  • CATEGORIES:
  • Open
  • Co-operative
  • Commons
  • Inspiring Projects
  • Legal Structures
  • Software
  • Audio
  • Video

Should Tech Companies That Derive All Their Value from Users Be Co-ops?

March 2, 2015 By Josef 1 Comment

NOTE: This great article by @kirstystyles1 links to this website with the text “plenty of resources”, which is flattering (and would be true if the 50 or so draft posts I’ve got half-done were published), but where I’ve actually curated plenty of resources is over on the co-operatives shelf of the United Diversity library

Writing for Forbes last December, Cameron Keng argued that if Apple were a co-operative, each of its employees — from mine to production line, in-store genius to CEO — would have earned a $403,000 share of its profits last year, on top of one’s salary. But Apple is neither jointly owned nor democratically controlled by its workers. Nor are the vast majority of digital companies starting-up today.

Companies like online shoe retailer Zappos, now owned by Amazon, have famously adopted holocratic principles that encourage a flatter structure and abolish job titles, but that greater equality ends at wages and stock options. While Zappos looks a far cry from the rigid hierarchy seen at Apple, its approach appears more as a socialization of efforts and privatization of profit, hardly opening up the business for the benefit of all its workers.

“The Internet is built upon global cooperation and collaboration often with people you don’t even know,” said Rhiannon Colvin, founder of AltGen, which helps young people combat youth unemployment and precarious work by setting up their own co-ops. “There is a lot of synergy between the values of the open-source movement and the co-operative movement, but it has yet to be capitalized on.”

She added, “Imagine if new digital and tech inventions such as Facebook or Uber were owned by the people that actually create the wealth — the users of Facebook that generate the content and all the taxi drivers that work with Uber. Of course, there would still be paid staff to run it and innovate, but the shares and growth of the business would be making everyday people richer, not already-wealthy investors.”

In just such a move, Marcos Menendez launched the TheGoodData co-op a few months ago to see if he could help combat growing issues about data ownership by ensuring that “users are part of the solution.” But he’s only too familiar with the challenges that co-ops can bring. Global finance systems are not built for them and there isn’t yet an out-of-the-box solution for setting one up anywhere in the world. There are also questions over whether co-ops can work at scale and, in an increasingly unequal society, how to garner the necessary first-stage startup costs.

La’Zooz, a ridesharing platform launched late last year that offers users community-based tokens for shared journeys, is attempting to get around this complexity by operating without any ownership. “It has governance principles and tools, but has no legal basis,” Menendez explained. “Its members couldn’t set up an office, but they can work together to try and oust Uber and Lyft.”

One of the key things a co-op model could offer tech is a re-engagement with its supply chains and a more holistic approach to tech production. Catherine Williams is a director (alongside all of her colleagues) at workers’ co-op Unicorn, a food store based in Manchester. “Regardless of a member’s primary role, everyone has shop-floor time, whether it’s on the till, managing the store, making soup at the deli or packing commodities on our production site,” she said. “In food, we talk a lot about the farmers, the people doing the hard work in the fields. In tech, nobody really talks about the factory workers, working long hours, or the children out in illegal mines foraging for tin.”

The collaborative message does seem to be hitting home with some unlikely characters at the top of the tech industry. Fred Wilson, a venture capitalist with Union Square Ventures in New York City, has started engaging in online conversations with his peers about community ownership of tech companies. “With more and more web and mobile applications deriving their value mostly or completely from their user base (Facebook, Twitter, eBay, Etsy, Reddit, Kickstarter, Uber, etc), there is a growing sense that the community could or should have some real ownership in these businesses,” he wrote in January.

Some policymakers are also taking note. A $1.2 million investment in workers’ co-ops by the New York City Council announced last year was quickly bettered by a $5 million investment by the mayor of Madison in Wisconsin. “With a co-operative you don’t have to worry about a buyout,” said Mayor Paul Soglin. “You don’t have to worry about a CEO one day picking up and moving the company to Fargo. With a co-operative you can have confidence that the company and the wealth it generates are going to stay local.”

Williams of the food shop in Manchester said, “The main perk for me is, ‘a problem shared is a problem halved,’ and if I had a similar role in a hierarchical business, I’d probably have a lot of sleepless nights. The only negative I can come up with is decision-making. Consensus isn’t always the easiest or quickest method, but the advantages are well worth it. We learn from one another all the time and are able to make strong, well-founded decisions upheld by a unified and active membership.”

Still, Rhiannon Colvin believes the co-operative movement has been “incredibly bad at making itself look cool, sexy and progressive,” which is a real issue for our image-obsessed culture. But, she added, “It fundamentally challenges capitalist structures of power and wealth distribution, which most startups replicate.” Perhaps cooperation simply appears more of a political statement than many apolitical techies are willing to make.

So while it’s unlikely that Apple CEO Tim Cook will swap his comfy boardroom chair for a tin mine in Indonesia anytime soon, there are already plenty of resourcesand hundreds of successful case studies to help organizations that want to give co-ops a go.

Header image: Cooperative, Narbonne, France. Photo credit: Yann Gar/ CC BY-SA 2.0.

Filed Under: Co-operative

Trackbacks

  1. Swarm - Who owns the future? New forms of ownership for networked ventures says:
    March 23, 2015 at 10:35 am

    […] within the system are also starting to recognize their own power and make some adjustments. The Uber Drivers Network was formed in New York City in May 2014 and has helped lead protests and strikes.Other models are […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Books

Ours to Hack and Own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism
UK orders only: Discount price: £10 + £3 P&P

Processing ...


Sharing Cities – Activating the Urban Commons
UK orders only: Discount price: £15 + £3 P&P

Processing ...

Sign up for occasional News

Recent Posts

  • If you value your privacy you should stop using Gmail November 16, 2021
  • A new model for grant funding – to finance the collaborative Commons June 16, 2021
  • The self-reinforcing nature of cooperation and ethical business June 11, 2021
  • Resonate is creating a Co-operative Privacy and Trust system for digital dignity across communities October 23, 2020
  • Decent Gov Now October 15, 2020
  • OPEN 2020: Networked Commons Initiatives July 17, 2020
  • Bristol Pay – a possible future for local currencies July 10, 2020
  • VIDEO: OPEN 2020 – Governance in collaborative projects July 9, 2020
  • Video: OPEN 2020 – Mutual credit deep dive July 3, 2020
  • VIDEO: OPEN 2020 – Cooperation will win June 29, 2020
  • VIDEO: OPEN 2020 – Mr Gee June 29, 2020
  • VIDEO: OPEN 2020 – Universal Basic Everything June 29, 2020
  • VIDEO: OPEN 2020 – Coordination in decentralised networks June 22, 2020
  • VIDEO: OPEN 2020 – Tools of collaboration June 20, 2020
  • VIDEO: OPEN 2020 – Introducing mutual credit June 20, 2020

Tags

Currency Data DecentGov Democracy Dmytri Kleiner Dynamic Equity Enspiral Grunt Fund John Restakis Loomio Michel Bauwens Mike Moyer Multistakeholder Mutual Credit OPEN 2017 Open Co-ops Open Value Networks P2P Foundation Platform Co-ops Resonate Slicing Pie Stir

Contact The Open Co-op

Privacy policy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Open source email

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in